Bombay High Court
Ashok Ramdas Perdeshi @ Pardeshi vs The State Of Maharashtra on 7 October, 2019
Bench: T.V. Nalawade
Speaking to Minutes.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2955 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.878 OF 2019 Gulabrao s/o Baburao Deokar .. Applicant Vs.The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents —
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2956 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.879 OF 2019 Chandrakant s/o Baliram Sonawane .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2960 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.880 OF 2019
1) Sadhana Radhesham Kogta
2) Subhadrabai Suresh Naik
3) Alka Nitin Laddha .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH 1 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.doc CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2969 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.882 OF 2019 Sunanda Ramesh Chandelkar .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2970 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.883 OF 2019 Digambar Dalpat Patil .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2984 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.890 OF 2019
1) Vijay Ramdas Wani
2) Pandurang Raghunath Kale
3) Sudha Pandurang Kale
4) Vijay Panditrao Kolhe .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2985 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.891 OF 2019 2 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.doc Ajay Ram Jadhav .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2994 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.893 OF 2019Chandrakant @ Abashankar Kapse .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2995 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.894 OF 2019
1) Devidas Baliram Dhande
2) Liladhar Natthu Sarode
3) Pushpalata Shaligram Attarde .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2997 OF 2019 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3296 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.886 OF 2019 3 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.doc
1) Bhagatram Ravalmal Blani (Balani)
2) Dattu Devram Koli
3) Kailas Narayan Sonawane
4) Meena Anil Wani
5) Sadashiv Ganpat Dhekle .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2998 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.895 OF 2019Shivcharan s/o Kanhaiyalal Dhandore .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2999 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.896 OF 2019Arun s/o Narayan Shirsale .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3001 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.898 OF 2019
1) Afzalkhan s/o Raufkhan Patwe 4 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.doc
2) Iqbaloddin Pirjade
3) Mumtajbi Hussain Khan .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3002 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.899 OF 2019
1) Chatrabhuj s/o Soma Sonwane
2) Rekha w/o Chatrabhuj Sonwane .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3013 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.906 OF 2019Ashok Ramdas Perdeshi @ Pardeshi .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3019 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.908 OF 2019Vasudev s/o Parshuram Sonawane .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents 5 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.doc

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3020 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 909 OF 2019Laxmikant @ Kanti Tukaram Chaudhari .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3024 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 911 OF 2019
1) Saraswati Ramdas Koli
2) Alka Arvind Rane
3) Digambar Daulat Wani
4) Nirmala Suryakant Bhosle
5) Vimal Budho Patil .. Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3037 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 917 OF 2019Manjula Dharmendra Kadam .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

6 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.doc WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3042 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 922 OF 2019Meena Amrutlal Mandhan .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3043 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 923 OF 2019Shantaram s/o Chindhu Sapkale .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3044 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 924 OF 2019Chudaman Shankar Patil .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3087 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 936 OF 2019 7 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.docAshok s/o Kashinath Sapkale .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

Shri. R. N. Dhorde, Senior Advocate, instructed by Shri V. R.Dhorde, and S/Shri. Mahesh S. Deshmukh, Bharat R. Waramaa,Joydeep Chatterji, R. R. Mantri, N. L. Chaudhari, Girish V. Wani,V. D. Sapkal, Paresh B. Patil, Kishore C. Sant, RajendrraaDeshmukh, N. S. Ghanekar, Girish Nagori, Abhaysinh K. Bhosle,A. B. Kale and Vinod P. Patil, Advocates for the respectiveapplicants.
Shri P. P. Chavan, Special Public Prosecutor, for respondents -State.

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2019PER COURT :
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. During speaking to minutes, learned counsels for theapplicants submitted that the Trial Court is not accepting any affidavit ofthe relative, when the relatives of the applicants are filing affidavit to theeffect that applicants – accused have not obtained passports. Whensuch affidavit is filed by the relatives like son, wife, brother, sister, it canbe accepted by the trial Court to presume that no any such passport is 8 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 ::: Speaking to Minutes.docobtained by the accused. However, to see that the applicants -accused are not leaving the country, affidavit to be filed by the saidrelative before the Trial Court.
3. Authenticated copy is allowed. Registrar (Judicial) to sendcopy. Copy can be sent by fax or other mode of service.
4. If passports are surrendered, the receipt to that effect is tobe given to the same Court. (K.K. SONAWANE, J.) (T.V. NALAWADE, J.)SVH 9 of 9 ::: Uploaded on – 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 08/10/2019 04:47:33 :::

News Reporter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: