Bombay High Court
Onkar S/O Sakharam Revanwar, R/O … vs State Of Mah, Thr P.S. Pusad (City) … on 21 May, 2019
Bench: Pushpa Virendra Ganediwala
1 apl 394.19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 812 of 2019 in Criminal Application (APL) No. 394 of 2019(Onkar s/o Sakharam Revanwar Vs. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., P.S. Pusad (City) and anr.)——————————————————————————————————–Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court’s or Judge’s OrderCoram, appearances, Court’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s order Shri H. S. Chawhan, Advocate for the applicant Shri V. P. Gangane, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.
DATE : 21/5/2019 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court vide order dated 18-4-2019 was pleased to grant interim relief to the applicant, however, the said relief was vacated by an order dated 2-5-2019 on the ground that notice of the application could not be issued to the non- applicant as copy of the criminal application was not supplied. Now, the learned counsel for the applicant filed on record copy of the hamdast/receipt at annexure-Z to show that notice has been issued. Learned counsel submits that if the order dated 2-5-2019 is not recalled, the original application for quashing of FIR would be ::: Uploaded on – 21/05/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 22/05/2019 04:05:51 ::: 2 apl 394.19.odt rendered infructuous.
3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor confirms that till date, charge-sheet has not been filed. In the interest of justice, the order dated 2-5-2019 is recalled, however, subject to costs of Rs. 2,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur within a period of two weeks. The application is disposed of.
JUDGEwasnik ::: Uploaded on – 21/05/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 22/05/2019 04:05:51 :::