Case Note: Sanjay D. Jain v. State of Maharashtra, Supreme Court of India, Criminal Appeal No. 12584 of 2024, decided on 26 September 2025 Headnote…
| Posted on: September 28, 2025 |
Case Note: Sanjay D. Jain v. State of Maharashtra, Supreme Court of India, Criminal Appeal No. 12584 of 2024, decided on 26 September 2025 Headnote…
| Posted on: September 28, 2025 |
Case Note: Odela Satyam & Anr. v. State of Telangana & Ors., 2025 INSC 1174 Headnote Criminal Law — Multiple FIRs — Consolidation of cases…
| Posted on: September 28, 2025 |
Once execution of a cheque is admitted, presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act apply, and the burden shifts to the accused to rebut. Mere allegation of the complainant’s financial incapacity, without evidence, is insufficient to rebut the presumption
| Posted on: September 27, 2025 |
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 498A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act can be sustained against the brother-in-law where the FIR contains only vague, omnibus allegations without specific details of cruelty or demand of dowry.
| Posted on: September 25, 2025 |
Wife though qualified in law but without sufficient income is entitled to maintenance according to husband’s status. Mere educational qualification not bar unless adequate income proved. Husband’s remarriage constitutes just ground for wife to reside separately and claim maintenance. Major unmarried daughter entitled to maintenance till marriage under S.20(3) HAMA notwithstanding majority
| Posted on: September 22, 2025 |
This decision marks an important shift in Indian tort jurisprudence by affirming the maintainability of civil claims for alienation of affection, a cause of action long recognised in theory but never squarely tested in civil proceedings. While the Court has cautiously limited its ruling to the threshold of maintainability, the recognition that personal autonomy in intimate matters does not exclude civil liability for wrongful third-party interference could pave the way for an expansion of tort remedies into the marital sphere. However, concerns remain over evidentiary burdens, the quantification of damages, and the potential for such claims to be misused as collateral litigation in matrimonial disputes. The case thus opens a new, albeit contested, frontier in the intersection of family law and tort law in India.
| Posted on: September 22, 2025 |
The spirit of Quranic injunctions favours monogamy; polygamy is only an exception permissible when the husband can ensure equal justice and maintenance to all wives. Successive marriages by a destitute blind beggar “cannot be accepted at all, even as per Muslim customary law.”
| Posted on: September 20, 2025 |
A demand notice under Section 138(b) of the NI Act is not valid if it mentions an amount different from the cheque amount. Typographical error in stating the amount cannot be excused in law.
| Posted on: September 20, 2025 |
In fiscal statutes, limitation provisions are mandatory. Revenue cannot resort to Section 21 to revive time-barred assessments that have already been attempted under Section 19. Taxing statutes must be construed strictly; no tax can be levied by analogy or intention.
| Posted on: September 19, 2025 |
Case Note: Shanti Devi v. Jagan Devi & Ors. Case Citation: 2025 INSC 1105, Civil Appeal No. 11795 of 2025 (@SLP(C) No. 24821/2018) Court: Supreme…
| Posted on: September 15, 2025 |