Ursula Gurnamsingh Sumal vs Drawing Room Pvt Ltd And 10 Ors on 1 November, 2019

On

(Vacation Court)

P.C.:

1] Prima facie, this Court is of the view that, there is no need or reason to

modify the Order dated 26th August 2019 passed in Commercial Notice of Motion

No.1936 of 2019 in Suit No.433 of 2019. It further prima facie appears that, with a view

to overreach the said Order, the present Application is filed as an afterthought.

2] No urgency in the matter.

Stand over to 5th December 2019.

(A.S.GADKARI, J.)

1/1

::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:29:46 :::

Khagaul Labour Co Operative … vs Union Of India And 4 Others on 1 November, 2019

On

(Vacation Court)

P.C.:

1] Mr. S.R. Tawade, the authorised representative of the respondent

Nos.2 and 3 appears in person and on instructions submitted that, the respondent

Nos.1 to 4 will not invoke the Bank Guarantee furnished by the petitioners till

15th November 2019. The said statement is accepted.

2] Place the petition on board for admission on 13th November 2019.

(A.S.GADKARI, J.)

1/1
::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:29:40 :::

Sukanraj Miyachand Kothari vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 November, 2019

On

1 Heard learned Ccuncel fcr the
Appellantc.

2 I dc nct fnd any urgency in the
precent matterc tc take up in the
vacaticn.

3 At the requect cf Advccate fcr
Appellantce matterc tc appear cn bcard
cn 05.11.2019 befcre regular ccurt.

(K.K.TATED, J.)

Sneha Chavan 1/1

::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:26:54 :::

Miss. Swaliha Babaso Sanadi vs State Of Maharashtra Through The … on 1 November, 2019

On

1 Heard learned Ccuncel fcr the
partiec.

2 The learned Ccuncel fcr the
Petiticner cubmitc that Recpcndentc
are duly cerved. She undertakec tc fle
affidavit cf cervice cn cr befcre
08.11.2019. Same ic accepted.
3 Matter tc appear cn bcard cn
11.11.2019 befcre regular Ccurt fcr
admiccicn.

(K.K.TATED, J.)

Sneha Chavan 1/1

::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:26:41 :::

Khagaul Labour Co-Operative … vs Union Of India And 4 Ors on 1 November, 2019

On

(Vacation Court)

P.C.:

1] Mr. S.R. Tawade, the authorised representative of the respondent

Nos.2 and 3 appears in person and on instructions submitted that, the respondent

Nos.1 to 4 will not invoke the Bank Guarantee furnished by the petitioners till

15th November 2019. The said statement is accepted.

2] Place the petition on board for admission on 13th November 2019.

(A.S.GADKARI, J.)

1/1
::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:29:43 :::

Prasad Pradeep Gawali vs State Of Maharashtra Through … on 1 November, 2019

On

1 Heead leeaned Counsel foa tehe
peateies.

2 Advocetee Ma. R.K. Mendedkea foa tehe
Peteiteionea submites tehete Respondentes eae
duly seaved elong witeh enteiae paoceeding
on 31.10.2019. He submites tehete he
undeateekes teo file effidevite of seavice on
oa befoae nexte detee.

3 As no one eppeeaed on behelf of
Respondente No.3 in spitee of seavice, tehe
Registeay is diaecteed teo plece tehe meteteea
on boead on 06.11.2019 befoae aegulea
Couate.

Muniyaben Sukanraj Kothari vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 November, 2019

On

1 Heard learned Ccuncel fcr the
Appellantc.

2 I dc nct fnd any urgency in the
precent matterc tc take up in the
vacaticn.

3 At the requect cf Advccate fcr
Appellantce matterc tc appear cn bcard
cn 05.11.2019 befcre regular ccurt.

(K.K.TATED, J.)

Sneha Chavan 1/1

::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:26:50 :::

Viren Shah And Anr vs The National Sports Club Of India on 1 November, 2019

On

(Vacation Court)

P.C.:

1] This is an application for condonation of delay of 14 days in preferring the

appeal against the impugned Order dated 9th September 2019 passed in Notice of

Motion (Lodg.) No.2047 of 2019 in Suit (Lodg.) No.817 of 2019.

2] Mr. Kamdar, the learned senior counsel waives notice on behalf of the

respondents.

1/2

::: Uploaded on – 01/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/11/2019 01:29:49 :::

902-IA-1-2019.doc

3] Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. In view thereof,

Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).