Mentioned by way of preacipe before the vacation court.

This group Matters were originally mentioned on 28/12/2018
and circulation was granted for hearing / admission on
01/01/2019 before vacation court.

Though circulation is granted for hearing on 01/01/2019, Adv
for the petitioner again mentioned the matter on 31/12/2018 and
vacation court has refused circulation and directed the office to
place the matter before regular bench after vacation.

Hence, s.o.to 03/01/2019 for admission on regular court as per
roaster.

( ASSOCIATE )

Page 2/2

::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:24 :::

. The learned Counsel for the applicant on instructions seeks

leave to withdraw the application as the applicant has already

approached the learned Sessions Judge seeking Anticipatory Bail and

that application is coming up for hearing tomorrow i.e. on 01.01.2019.

2. In such circumstances, Anticipatory Bail Application is

disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to mention that the learned

Sessions Judge shall decide the Application for Bail on its own merits

and in accordance with law.

( C.V. BHADANG, J. )

Shubham Page 1 of 1
::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:25 :::

. Praecipe dated 31.12.2018 is taken on record.

2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 04.01.2019.

Humdast allowed. No interim relief at this stage.

( C.V. BHADANG, J. )

Shubham Page 1 of 1
::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:26 :::

Mentioned by way of preacipe before the vacation court.

This group Matters were originally mentioned on 28/12/2018
and circulation was granted for hearing / admission on
01/01/2019 before vacation court.

Though circulation is granted for hearing on 01/01/2019, Adv
for the petitioner again mentioned the matter on 31/12/2018 and
vacation court has refused circulation and directed the office to
place the matter before regular bench after vacation.

Hence, s.o.to 03/01/2019 for admission on regular court as per
roaster.

( ASSOCIATE )

Page 2/2

::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:23 :::

Mentioned by way of preacipe before the vacation court.

Place the matter for ad-interim relief on 07/01/2019 on regular
board as per roaster.

( ASSOCIATE )

Page 1/1

::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:21 :::

Mentioned by way of preacipe before the vacation court.

This group Matters were originally mentioned on 28/12/2018
and circulation was granted for hearing / admission on
01/01/2019 before vacation court.

Though circulation is granted for hearing on 01/01/2019, Adv
for the petitioner again mentioned the matter on 31/12/2018 and
vacation court has refused circulation and directed the office to
place the matter before regular bench after vacation.

Hence, s.o.to 03/01/2019 for admission on regular court as per
roaster.

( ASSOCIATE )

Page 2/2

::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:22 :::

Mentioned by way of Preacipe.

Place the matter on 03/01/2019 on regular board as per roaster.

( ASSOCIATE )

Page 1/1

::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:20 :::

. Heard Shri. Satpute learned Counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents for some

time.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that

by a letter issued yesterday i.e. on 30.12.2018, the petitioner has been

asked to furnish the permission granted by the Pune university for

holding the function within the campus of the said university. The

learned Additional Government Advocate points out that as per the

letter dated 28.12.2018, the university has refused the permission to

hold a programme on 31.12.2018. Shri. Satpute, learned Counsel for

the petitioner states that he will seek instructions from the petitioner on

Shubham Page 1 of 2
::: Uploaded on – 31/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 31/12/2018 22:44:26 :::
Cri. WP5903-2018.doc

the said letter and then respond appropriately. He therefore seeks time.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that Mr. Chandra

Shekhar Azad, the President of Bhim Army All India, has been detained

without authority.