Shivaji S/O. Marutirao Khude vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 8 April, 2020

2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 06th May, 2020.

Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for respondent – State.

3. Perused F.I.R. and related papers.

4. A written F.I.R. was lodged. The applicants are the public servants.

F.I.R. has been lodged by one of their colleagues. On careful perusal of F.I.R.

and the related papers filed alongwith these appeals, case for grant of interim

protection is made out. Hence, the following order :-

ORDER

(i) Till next date, in the event of arrest of the appellants, in
connection with Crime No. 14 of 2020 registered with Vazirabad
Police Station, Dist. Nanded for the offences punishable under
Sections 166, 167, 177, 182, 417, 465, 471, 477, 120-B read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(P),
3(1)(Q) and 3(2)(5)(A) of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the appellants be released on
executing P.R. bonds in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen
Thousand Only) each with surety in the like amount.

Sunil S/O. Ramu Bhil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 8 April, 2020

Heard.

2. Admit. Learned APP waives notice for the

respondent.

[R.G. AVACHAT, J.]

kbp

::: Uploaded on – 08/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 09/04/2020 09:12:07 :::
2 3-Cri. Appln.931 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.931 OF 2020
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.284 OF 2020

Sunil s/o. Ramu Bhil ..Applicant
Vs.

Sk. Salim Abdul Kadar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 8 April, 2020

Heard.

2. Issue notice to the respondent. Learned APP

waives notice on behalf of the respondent. Stand over

to 06.05.2020

[R.G. AVACHAT, J.]

kbp

::: Uploaded on – 08/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 09/04/2020 09:12:11 :::
4-Cri. Rev. Appln.No.75 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.950 OF 2020
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.75 OF 2020

Sk. Salim Abdul Kadar ..Applicant

Vs.

Prabhakar S/O. Vithal Terke vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 8 April, 2020

2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 06th May, 2020.

Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for respondent – State.

3. Perused F.I.R. and related papers.

4. A written F.I.R. was lodged. The applicants are the public servants.

F.I.R. has been lodged by one of their colleagues. On careful perusal of F.I.R.

and the related papers filed alongwith these appeals, case for grant of interim

protection is made out. Hence, the following order :-

ORDER

(i) Till next date, in the event of arrest of the appellants, in
connection with Crime No. 14 of 2020 registered with Vazirabad
Police Station, Dist. Nanded for the offences punishable under
Sections 166, 167, 177, 182, 417, 465, 471, 477, 120-B read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(P),
3(1)(Q) and 3(2)(5)(A) of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the appellants be released on
executing P.R. bonds in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen
Thousand Only) each with surety in the like amount.

Vilas S/O. Ganpatrao Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 8 April, 2020

. Mr. Sarwade, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mr. S. S.

Chaudhari, informs to have instructions to appear on behalf of

respondent No.2. He seeks time to file Vakalatnama.

2. Perused the First Information Report (FIR) and the related

papers. The appellant is a Development Officer of Life Insurance

Corporation of India (LIC). The informant is the LIC agent. It

appears that all is not well between the two since 2002. The case for

grant of interim protection is made out.

1 of 2

::: Uploaded on – 08/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 09/04/2020 09:11:35 :::
2 22-Cri-Apeal-232-2020.doc

Yogesh Hanuman Gavhane And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 8 April, 2020

. Heard.

2. Perused the First Information Report (FIR). There is CCTV

footage on record indicate the appellant Nos. 1 and 3 were not at the

scene of offence at the relevant time. The learned APP admits this

position. In view of the above the appellant Nos. 1 and 3 are granted

temporary bail in terms of the following order.

3. The appellant Nos. 1 and 3 be released on bail in connection

with Crime No.0040/2020 registered at Beed City Police Station,

1 of 2

::: Uploaded on – 08/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 09/04/2020 09:12:46 :::
2 23-Cri-Apeal-277-2020.doc

Beed for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 143, 144, 147,

148, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under

Sections 3, 4/25 of the Arms Act and under Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)

(va), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989, on executing P. R. bond in the

sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with surety

bond in the like amount.

Magas Samaj Seva Mandal Devtala … vs The State Of Maharashtra And … on 8 April, 2020

This petition is filed at the instance of 32 institutes. In view of

the title clause and tenor of the petition, one may presume that this

petition is in representative capacity. The petitioners are challenging

the order dated 26th March, 2020, issued by respondent No.3 – Deputy

Commissioner, Women & Child Development, Maharashtra State,

Pune.

::: Uploaded on – 08/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 09/04/2020 08:43:26 :::

10550.20wpst
(2)

2. The submission of Mr Dahiphale, learned Counsel appearing

with Mr Jamalpurkar, learned Counsel for the petitioners is, there is an

extreme urgency in the matter in view of the order dated 26 th March,

2020, whereby the amount against grant-in-aid to the petitioners –

institutes was to be disbursed before the closure of the financial year.

He then submits that due to declaration of lock-down, the petitioners –

institutes are unable to receive any amount of grant-in-aid and they

may suffer financial loss.

Mamta W/O Pradeep Patange vs The State Of Maharashtra And … on 8 April, 2020

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. In response to the notice dated 3rd April, 2020, issued by this Court, Mr

Dande, learned AGP for the respondents made available the report of the

experts committee. Needless to state that in view of the directions of this

::: Uploaded on – 08/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on – 09/04/2020 08:43:18 :::
(2) wpst10542.20

Court, the petitioner was subjected to medical examination.

3. Perusal of the report of the experts committee duly signed by all the

members of the committee shows that the committee made key

recommendations and also recorded it’s findings, which read thus: