Bombay High Court
Dayco Ip Holdings Llc vs Mago Gurupriit S, Prop. Jay Kay … on 1 June, 2019
Bench: S.J. Kathawalla
Nitin 1 / 2 902-CONPL-90-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION CONTEMPT PETITION (L) NO. 90 OF 2019 IN COMIP NO. 1387 OF 2018Dayco IP Holdings LLC … PetitionerVersusMago Gurupriit S,Proprietor of Jay Kay International & Anr. … RespondentsMr.Hiren Kamod a/w. Mr. Kunal Kanungo i/b. Cogito Legal for the Plaintiff.Mr.Viral Rathod i/b. Narendrakumar Sharma for Respondent No. 1Mr.Pranay Mangharam i/b. MZD Legal Consultancy for Respondent No. 2.Mr.A.B.Malvankar, Section Officer a/w. Mr. R.B.Ghadi, Assistant Section Officer,from the office of the Court Receiver, present.Mr.Mago Gurupriit S. – Respondent No.1 present in person.Mr.Manoj Pahuja – Respondent No. 2 present in person. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATED : 1ST JUNE,2019 (IN CHAMBERS)P.C.:
1. Affidavit in Reply of Respondent No. 1 is taken on record. Respondent No. 1through his Advocate undertakes to file further Affidavit setting out the particulars ofhis Distributors and the particulars of all his warehouses / godowns. He shall in hisAffidavit also deal with the Affidavit of Respondent No. 2 more particularly denial ofRespondent No. 2 that he is not the Distributor of Respondent No. 1.
2. The learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No. 1 has filed his ::: Uploaded on – 01/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/06/2019 02:57:27 ::: Nitin 2 / 2 902-CONPL-90-2019.docVakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 1.
3. Since the matter is partly heard, by consent the same is treated as PartHeard.
4. Stand over to 10th June, 2019 at 2.30 p.m. in Chambers. In the meantime,the earlier ad-interim order shall continue.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) ::: Uploaded on – 01/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on – 02/06/2019 02:57:27 :::

News Reporter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: